ON LEADING A TEAM
There has to be a director. There has to be an appointed person who ultimately says, "This is how it's going to go." But it’s nuanced, it's not just a black and white thing. The thing I'm tasked with with every show is playing that collaborative spectrum of when to yield and recognise a good collaborative suggestion versus going, "Hey, that's a great way to approach this, but in order for all these other pieces that are outside of your department to fit, we're going to do it this way.”
Directing and leadership is more of a conductor role. A good director, in my opinion, has a working knowledge of every department. I am not going to be able to mix a 64-input show down the two channels and sound amazing on your laptop speakers, but I can at least know that a mixer has this big board in front of them and a lot of plugins and a lot of things, and I need to be like, "Hey, I hear something in my experience that sounds louder than it should. Can you find it and address it?"
The same point with videos. I'm not going to have the bandwidth to necessarily be making every lighting decision, but I do need to go, "Hey, lighting director for this particular scene, it does need to have reds. Can we use your tools to make sure that red comes from this location on the stage?" What I'm getting at is that leadership is a collaboration that is fine-tuned by experience. And it is led by adhering to the overarching vision.
ON WORKING WITH OTHERS
Whenever we film, it’s not just my team that I’m working with. I need to interface with the talents' team, with their management, and inevitably we have overlapping and sometimes conflicting needs and wants. That’s the nature of all work and collaborations.
But at the end of the day, I always come back to this general rhetoric. We all want the same thing. We all want a show that's successful. We all want to look the right way, we all want to be lit the right way. Everybody wants to use the stage the right way.
Everybody wants to sound their best. And when creative decisions must be made to help achieve the vision and put the cogs in all the right places so the machine runs as efficiently as possible, then it's imperative to have a very transparent dialogue.
I feel like transparency is really the most effective tool when we come to this and collaborating with labels and artists. At the end of the day, I always go back to we all want the same thing. And when the decisions aren’t based around creative choices, then it becomes very factual. Technical limitations are technical limitations. They don't have opinions. They're on and off switches, they're electrical signals, and they don't care.
Some things are simply not compatible with your production plan, and then you’re facing less of a “can we / can’t we” decision, and “is this want worth uprooting an otherwise well-laid-out plan.” Sometimes those big swings turn into big rewards, but those same big swings can be the dominoes that topple all the others. Measuring this risk /reward scenario is probably the most critical lesson and realisation when it comes to business development.
THE BIGGEST LESSON
Bryan’s takeaways aren’t isolated insights. They’re part of a larger framework I’ve been developing to help teams perform better under pressure. In this new ongoing series, I’ll show how lessons from behind the scenes in entertainment can help every executive lead with more clarity, creativity, and impact. Stay tuned for next time…
Mike Dias writes and speaks about Why Nobody Likes Networking and What Entertainers Can Teach Executives. He is one of the few global leaders in Trade Show Networking and he helps companies maximise their trade show spend by ensuring that their teams are prepared, ready, and able to create and close opportunities. This column will be an ongoing monthly feature because Mike loves talking shop and is honoured to give back to the community. If this article was helpful and useful in any way, please reach out anytime at Mike Dias Speaks and let Mike know about what you want to hear more about next time.